A year later i don’t seem to have been wrong. It made me lose all faith in you and your development process.
A year or so ago i remember seeing how you wanted and wasted time to introduce multiplayer to a game that can barely handle single player.
My point is basically imho that performance is the single most important aspect that needs improving. I don’t know what the major culprit of the drops in stonehearth are, but i find that it’s necessary to play a mini game of clean up the map using the debug tools removing anything unnecessary when i have the time and it feels like it helps. My current save has just 22 hearthlings, which is pathetic. In perspective to DF my pc can handle maybe 200 dwarves without any major performance sinks, and each dwarf is near infinitely more complex than a hearthling. After a day of playing the save becomes almost unplayable. Stonehearth i’m sorry to say has god awful performance. Healthy design of your fort or disabling game features etc. If i wanted DF i could just play DF.Īnyway, I’ve played a lot of dwarf fortress in my day and what you learn to do as a seasoned player is taking many precautions to avoid fps death of the fort and increase it’s lifespan. I’m going to make some comparisons ahead to dwarf fortress, note that i’m not saying “hurr do what DF did” I’m comparing the games as separate entities with examples.
Now i’m writing this because it seems my save has reached the end of its life and it’s a pain to continue playing.
#Dwarf fortress fps death first summer update#
Excluding the recent new weather update which inspired me to create a new save. I haven’t played the game for about a year and felt saddened there’s barely been any updates since then. There’s nothing more satisfying than designing a building and watching it slowly get built.
0 kommentar(er)
